Jesse Schell.
Puzzles:
- Puzzles are in all forms of games. A puzzle can be which door to go through or which upgrade to grab.
- The "puzzle" of puzzles:
| Puzzles are a part of games but are they a game?
~ "Chris Crawford once made the bold statement that puzzles are not even really interactive, since they don't actively respond to the player."
This is compared to when man first found penguins (they're birds but can't fly?!)
- Scott Kim
| "A puzzle is fun and has a right answer"
~ The irony of that is that once a puzzle is finished it ceases to be fun!
- Puzzles vs. Games
| The main reason people don't class puzzles as games is because they aren't re playable.
- "When a game has a dominant strategy, it doesn't cease to be a game, it just isn't a good game.
- "A Puzzle is a game with a dominant strategy"
- GOOD PUZZLES
#1 Make the goal easily understood.
#2 Make it easy to get started.
#3 Give it a sense of progression.
#4 Give it a sense of solvability.
#5 Increase difficulty gradually.
#6 Parallelism lets the player rest (making the player stop and think, best way to avoid anger/rage-quits is to give multiple puzzles at once so if one appears too challenging they move onto another and still get a sense of achievement. (A CHANGE IS AS GOOD AS REST)
#7 Pyramid structure extends interest (series of small puzzles which contribute to the completion of a larger puzzle.)
#8 Hints extend interest.
#9 Give the answer.
#10 Perceptual shifts are a Marmite (you get it or you don't).
Saturday, 11 February 2012
Week 15 - What is a puzzle?
Scott Kim
What is a puzzle?
- A Puzzle is fun.
- You solve it using patient effort.
- A puzzle has a right answer.
The other half says that you view puzzles differently from games.
Why the "L" fold puzzle is fun:
- It's novel (Suspending rules of reality - Why would you fold a letter?) It's a change from the norm of reality.
- It's balanced. (Not too easy, not too hard, keeps the players attention and enjoys the challenge)
- It's tricky (You need to change how you percept the letter to gain the "correct" answer.)
The article says again that you still need to cater to the different type of players who play puzzles.
Puzzles vs Games
Game is where one player wins. There is an opposing player who responds to their actions. The difference isn't mechanics, mechanics can change easily.
Puzzles use rules like games, instead of winning, you are finding a solution.
Triangle of Play.
What is a puzzle?
- A Puzzle is fun.
- You solve it using patient effort.
- A puzzle has a right answer.
The other half says that you view puzzles differently from games.
Why the "L" fold puzzle is fun:
- It's novel (Suspending rules of reality - Why would you fold a letter?) It's a change from the norm of reality.
- It's balanced. (Not too easy, not too hard, keeps the players attention and enjoys the challenge)
- It's tricky (You need to change how you percept the letter to gain the "correct" answer.)
The article says again that you still need to cater to the different type of players who play puzzles.
Puzzles vs Games
Game is where one player wins. There is an opposing player who responds to their actions. The difference isn't mechanics, mechanics can change easily.
Puzzles use rules like games, instead of winning, you are finding a solution.
Triangle of Play.
Game - Win
Puzzle - Goal
Toy - No goal
Story - No Interaction
Tips for a good puzzle:
- Level Design (designer must cater to needs)
- Rule Design (rule sets are unique)
- Keep player happy, explain rules easily etc.
- Be creative.
Sunday, 29 January 2012
Week 13 - Building a Simple Level
"Game Level Design"
There are 'building blocks' of a level:
- Concept | Overall idea of game
- Environment | Graphics, sounds etc.
- Beginning | Where the start of the level is
- Ending | Where the exit/finish of the level is
- Goal | Why should the player want to reach the end?
- Challenge | The thing that makes the player enjoy completing the level
- Reward | Not limited to a 'New Weapon or Armour' can just be access to next level.
- Failure | Why should the player try the level again?
Do you need a story? No. Some games don't have stories, but can do if forced (eg. Chess - Medieval War). Byrne describes stories to 'enhance' levels rather than to base games around them.
Although there may be many different types of game genres, almost all share the same basic requirements for the individual levels that make up the game. Knowing what these building blocks are is critical to knowing what makes a good level.
- The more players can do a task without aid, makes the game more fulfilling.
- Simply finishing the level can be a reward, no need for fireworks.
- Don't make the player blame a poor game for failure, make them want to play better.
There are 'building blocks' of a level:
- Concept | Overall idea of game
- Environment | Graphics, sounds etc.
- Beginning | Where the start of the level is
- Ending | Where the exit/finish of the level is
- Goal | Why should the player want to reach the end?
- Challenge | The thing that makes the player enjoy completing the level
- Reward | Not limited to a 'New Weapon or Armour' can just be access to next level.
- Failure | Why should the player try the level again?
Do you need a story? No. Some games don't have stories, but can do if forced (eg. Chess - Medieval War). Byrne describes stories to 'enhance' levels rather than to base games around them.
Although there may be many different types of game genres, almost all share the same basic requirements for the individual levels that make up the game. Knowing what these building blocks are is critical to knowing what makes a good level.
- The more players can do a task without aid, makes the game more fulfilling.
- Simply finishing the level can be a reward, no need for fireworks.
- Don't make the player blame a poor game for failure, make them want to play better.
Week 8 - Players who suit MUDs
How do different styles of player relate to the game world and the other players around them?
Richard Bartle's article describes the people who play MUDs will normally be divided between 4 play-styles.
Achievers: These players are primarily focused on completing the game as quickly and efficiently as possible. They look to improve their character constantly and look to complete personal goals. They like to think they are playing the game the way it's meant to be played and see the game as a competition.
Explorers: Usually want to find out as much about the game as possible. They like to push the game for bugs and go looking for things that are hidden (easter eggs etc.)
Killers: These players try to distress the other players on the game by killing or annoying them. They like to troll or hurt other players etc.
Socializers: Normally care more about conversing with other players than actually playing the game. They like to trade and share stories etc.
The player types shown above are described by Bartle as extremely significant, as each one can have an impact on the other. So to make the game successful, it is important to make the game balanced so you don't have too much of a decrease/increase in one type of player.
Games are not limited to these 4 player types and this is only one template for the way people play games.
Richard Bartle's article describes the people who play MUDs will normally be divided between 4 play-styles.
Achievers: These players are primarily focused on completing the game as quickly and efficiently as possible. They look to improve their character constantly and look to complete personal goals. They like to think they are playing the game the way it's meant to be played and see the game as a competition.
Explorers: Usually want to find out as much about the game as possible. They like to push the game for bugs and go looking for things that are hidden (easter eggs etc.)
Killers: These players try to distress the other players on the game by killing or annoying them. They like to troll or hurt other players etc.
Socializers: Normally care more about conversing with other players than actually playing the game. They like to trade and share stories etc.
The player types shown above are described by Bartle as extremely significant, as each one can have an impact on the other. So to make the game successful, it is important to make the game balanced so you don't have too much of a decrease/increase in one type of player.
Games are not limited to these 4 player types and this is only one template for the way people play games.
Friday, 9 December 2011
Script (Design Methods)
Click the Bass
Script
Black Screen
SUPER: A JH ORIGINAL
Camera lights flashing, Marco on stage receiving applause
White Screen – to – baby Marco playing piano, then toddler Marco then Present Marco.
Back to Mr Sinclair with “$” signs in his eyes.
Mr Sinclair sits Marco down and promises that he will teach him to be the best, and that he has been offered a place in the “Music Inc. Academy”.
Marco signs the contract with Mr Sinclair rubbing hands vigorously.
White Screen – to – toddler Mr Sinclair kicking a football alone in the park in summer, then teenage him kicking it in winter, then older him kicking it in autumn.
Fade to worn out, prison-esque academy.
SUPER: 2 Weeks Later
Marco is seen playing on a piano with missing keys looking exhausted.
Camera pans round to see a number of students playing broken instruments with the “teachers” wearing suits and talking on phones.
Marco then has a wave of anarchy flood his body and decides to break into Mr Sinclair’s office.
Marco sneaks into office only to find posters of “Anti-Music” slogans.
Mr Sinclair enters room fuming, shouts abuse at Marco only for the boy to reply in the calmest fashion possible “There is more to music than just profits, so I challenge you to a music battle. I will destroy whoever you send to beat me I promise you.”
Mr Sinclair transforms into a 3 headed demon, each head picturing the face of the 3 artists Marco will face in battle.
The 3 heads shout at the same time, forcing Marco to take a step back, still looking calm and calculated however.
Fade to Arena.
Marco walks up to the stage and notices a Guitar, a turntable and a Microphone in front of him.
Over tannoy “Introducing the epic music battle of Marco Butsped vs. Mr Sinclair AKA the boss. The music genres Rock, Hip-Hop and dance music will be used in this battle. LAST...MAN......STANDING!”
The battle commences with the three headed Mr Sinclair grabbing the guitar and shouting over to Marco “WATCH THIS!”
He starts it off by ‘shredding’ the guitar, using the solo from Voodoo Child to try and over-power the young prodigy across the arena.
The battle goes back and forth, both using the different instruments to try and beat the other. Sparks fly and extraordinary colours emerge from the instruments with both competitors looking determined.
Mr Sinclair uses his wealth of musical knowledge to use all 3 instruments to defeat young Marco, with the crowd getting louder, sensing the end of the battle.
Close up to Mr Sinclair’s intense gaze.
Close up to Marco’s defeated look.
Close up to Mr Sinclair’s face lighting up at the prospect of victory.
Fade to Marco’s flashback of playing when he was younger.
Fade back to Marco with the arena lighting up as he gets faster on the guitar and then EXPLOSION emerging from Marco’s chest, musical power overcomes Marco and he silences the 3 headed demon, finishing him off with a final shout on the microphone “YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH”.
Crowd silenced, Marco walks over to the Music Inc. board and quietly asks if “it’s all over”. They reply by asking him to be the new boss, he accepts the offer and becomes the youngest manager ever.
Crowd cheers, camera pans to crowd and then Marco who is sitting there with a smile.
End.
Will be improved again before end of term, this is only a draft.
Will be improved again before end of term, this is only a draft.
Wednesday, 30 November 2011
Week 6 - Chance and Skill in games and how designers can implement them
Brenda Braithwaite & Ian Schreiber (2008) Challenges For Games Designers
Why is chance an important component in games and what tools does the designer have at their disposal to deploy this element?
Why is chance an important component in games and what tools does the designer have at their disposal to deploy this element?
Most games involve some kind of chance unless it is purely strategic such as tic-tac-toe or chess. Having a game that includes something to even the chances for the players is more likely to reach a wider audience over a game that is purely based on skill/strategy, but having the right balance of the two is up to the discretion of the designer.
Chance is something that gives the game random-ability that can ultimately match the skills of players as it bases success on the luck of something as simple as dice. A dice roll is purely random and that is what adds to the game, a sense of mystery and not knowing whether your action will help or hinder your progress in the game, and it can be used as an important dynamic in games design.
Designers can use chance in delaying solvability eg. in a game such as chess, there is an resolution to the game that is achieved by calculated moves and strategy by the player. A similar example is tic-tac-toe which is won through pure skill, but this can get tedious and chance enhances games by adding a random event, this is explained in the book as it "prevents the mastering of the game, because making the exact same decisions may lead to different outcomes".
Chance can also be used as making the play competitive for the weaker players, and it is explained in the book to prolong the enjoyment of a game for the weaker player, as it allows them to have a genuine chance of winning as there are random events that will cause a change to the game. For example in tic-tac-toe, an experienced player will know where to put the next symbol, but if an iteration to the game was considered to add chance, eg. dice roll to see who gets to put 2 symbols on the first turn, gives the weaker player a real chance to win which will ultimately keep him/her interested in the game for longer.
There are 4 mechanics that can be used to increase chance in games:
- Dice | Cube of 6 equal sides with 1-6 on the sides, rolled for a random number.
- Cards | Pack of 51, 4 suits (Ace to King 13 cards) shuffled to make random.
- Pseudo-Random number generators | A number that is close enough to be random generated by a computer.
- Hidden information | When a player doesn't know information it is random.
Why is skill an important component in games and what tools does the designer have at their disposal to deploy this element?
It says in the book "The heart of a good game is a series of interesting decisions" which is ultimately the definition of skill in games. A series of tactical/strategic decisions that will hopefully help the progress in the players quest of winning.
Skill is in my eyes the most important part in any game, and designers base their games around engrossing the player in a game that is full of decisions, as players of games integrate their feelings and experience of the game with the decisions they are making which makes it feel more real. There are many ways in gaming to make a decision that is seen to create an aspect of skill:
- Obvious decision | A decision too easy to make (eg. pick the higher number to win a prize "1" or "2")
- Meaningless decision | When a game makes it seem a decision is important, but it doesn't matter which choice you make, you'll end up in the same place whatever option you choose.
- Blind decisions | A decision where the player has no information to make a calculated choice. (eg. roulette, it still matters what number you choose, you just don't know where it's going to land)
- Trade-off's | Happens when a player doesn't have enough resources to reach his/her goals. A game is 'balanced' where the options given seem very important, but all have equal outcomes and only bases the outcome of the decision on the players environmental and personal styles.
- Dilemma | (example Golden Balls) This gives the player a sense of danger as whatever choice you make, it will have a negative outcome.
Thursday, 24 November 2011
Story (Design Methods)
ClickTheBASS
Story
Marco Butsped was a young boy from Rio de Janeiro who loved to compose classical music. He was highly regarded in the world of music as one of the biggest protégés ever. Being 13, he required a lot of support from his parents who would regularly donate their time and effort to make sure he always enjoys his music, but is still dedicated to being a top musician.
One day, Jeremy Sinclair of world renowned Music Inc. saw Marco playing at the Teatro Municipal in Rio. Mr Sinclair’s eyes immediately lit up at the prospect of having another prodigy join the ranks after seeing Marco direct an orchestra of over 60 members. What Marco and the rest of the world didn’t realise is that Mr Sinclair hates all forms of music, the last album he listened to was Chas ‘n’ Dave’s street party, and that was enough to convince him that music in general came straight from the depths of lower-class nobodies with nothing better to do. Mr Sinclair focused on profits rather than passion, business instead of beauty, and that left a distinct mark on his music label.
After talking to Marco’s parents about the exciting prospect of their son joining such a famous organisation to hone his musical abilities, they agreed to send him to the Music Inc. Academy for the talented. Overhearing the conversation, Marco goes giddy with the idea of attending such a prestigious academy under one of the biggest labels in the world. Mr Sinclair approaches Marco and offers him 24/7 access to high quality music labs/instruments, state of the art accommodation and 50 other young musical prodigies in which he can collaborate and learn from. Marco agrees without a second thought and Mr Sinclair smiles wryly as he can already taste the revenue on his lips.
Marco arrives at the Academy, keen to start composing and excited to meet all of the other young musical geniuses. As soon as Marco steps through the door after waving off his parents, he realises that every promise Mr Sinclair made was empty. He sees the worlds most gifted musicians confined to prison-esque bedrooms, one music room that has 2 piano’s, a couple of old guitars and an ancient soundbooth. Marco suddenly realises that Music Inc. are battery making artists to maximise profits. He frantically searches for a phone or any sort of communication to the outside world, he pleads to Mr Sinclair to let him go home, but the boss tells him that he is ‘here for the long run.'
Marco then bets Mr Sinclair that he could beat his 3 best artists (“Think Floyd” “Wu-Yang Clan” and “DJ Biesto”) in an epic battle of musical genius.
A series of musical battles reveal Marco's true powers as he out guitar's, out raps and out DJ's the three artists! Mr Sinclair pleads with Marco to stay but with the young prodigy pushing back the man's pointless talk, Mr Sinclair had no choice but to attack Marco with a barriage of bass that deafens the world but Marco beats him too, after a long fight of course. He claims his freedom and his trophy was to be the new manager of Music Inc.!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)